Superman: Man of Steel! . . . Or . . . Man of Boycott?

Author
Bradley W. Brooks, Steven M. Cox, Karen Shearer Dunn, Michael Kobre
Region
North America
Topic
Strategy & General Management
Length
12 pages
Keywords
congnitive
cognitive dissonance
publicity
Promotion
Public Relations
Student Price
$4.00
Target Audience
Undergraduate Students

In February 2013, DC announced a special anthology of Superman stories that would be cowritten by Orson Scott Card, who had actively spoken out against gay marriage. In response to the announced hiring of Card, over 16,000 people signed a petition to boycott the anthology (Truitt, 2013). Further, a few comic book retailers had refused to carry DC’s iconic Superman comics (Sieczkowski, 2013). The Superman franchise was one of DC Comics most profitable assets. At stake were not only graphic novel sales, but also movies and memorabilia. The concerns over how the boycott could affect movie revenues were particularly troubling since DC would be introducing a new Superman movie into theaters in June 2013. DC was counting on this movie being one of the summer blockbuster hits. Executives at DC Comics needed to determine the best course of action in light of the negative publicity surrounding Orson Scott Card’s position as a writer on the anthology.

Learning Outcomes
  1. Interpret the effect of negative publicity on products and services.
  2. Use cognitive dissonance theory to identify dissonant cognitions concerning Orson Scott Card and Superman.
  3. Recommend and support a course of action for DC Comics.