Maritime search and rescue in the Bahamas: An opportunity or excessive cost for the U.S. Coast Guard?

Author
Erin Palmer, LT, US Coast Guard, Army-Baylor University Benjamin Fischl, Capt, US Air Force, Army-Baylor University Fawn Helms, US Army, Army-Baylor University Cory Moore, CPT, US Army, Army-Baylor University Bryan Spear, MAJ, US Army, Army-Baylor Univers
Region
Latin & South America
North America
Topic
Operations
Strategy & General Management
Ethics & Social Justice
Length
3 pages
Keywords
international relations
public policy
Business Ethics
search and rescue
Student Price
$4.00
Target Audience
Faculty/Researchers
Graduate Students
Undergraduate Students
Executive Education
Other Audience

The U.S. Coast Guard has enjoyed a generally positive working relationship with the government of the Bahamas for decades. As the primary responsible party for maritime search and rescue (SAR) within the Bahamian archipelagic zone per the Grey Agreement, the Coast Guard’s District Seven (D7) frequently stretches its resources far beyond U.S. borders. Despite routinely providing assistance to other nations that fall within its area of responsibility, D7 does not assume the burden of SAR responsibility for any zone besides the Bahamas. Fiscal constraints necessitate that the opportunity cost of this mission be measured. The U.S. government has four primary courses of action available in this case: renegotiate the provisions of the Grey Agreement, maintain the status quo, or seek to dissolve the agreement entirely, with or without a new agreement. A thorough public policy analysis, an assessment of international relations implications, and both ethical and legal concerns must be considered.

Learning Outcomes

In completing this assignment, students should be able to:

1. Analyze the implications of the Grey Agreement within the context of public policy
2. Evaluate the viability of cooperative international agreements and their repercussions/ benefits to key stakeholders
3. Propose and defend an appropriate strategy to respond to an intergovernmental decision point, incorporating legal and ethical considerations

Application
This case is most appropriate for advanced undergraduate or graduate-level courses in public administration, public policy, international relations, and business law.