An Analysis of the FASB’s New Going-Concern Standard and Its Relation to Liquidation Basis Accounting Requirements

Joseph E. Trainor, Cynthia R. Phillips, Maryanne Cangialosi
January 1, 2018
North America
Accounting & Finance
20 pages
FASB, Liquidation, investment, capital-market
Student Price: 
Average rating: 
Whether a company expects to remain in existence for a reasonable time into the future is a fundamental consideration for investors and creditors when evaluating investment alternatives. Investors and creditors are understandably concerned about management’s ability to enhance the capital-providers’ investment, and any doubts about an entity’s future demise or liquidation is decision-useful information for these capital-market participants. To provide investors and creditors with some assurance about a company’s future survival, the accounting standards establish the going-concern assumption. While the going-concern assumption is a foundational underpinning of the financial reporting process, until recently, an entity’s management has had no formal responsibility for evaluating or disclosing conditions about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The burden of assessing the going-concern assumption has historically resided with the entity’s independent auditor, and disclosure of going-concern issues was not required if management was able to satisfy the auditor that the conditions raising uncertainty would be alleviated.

Add review

Vertical Tabs

Revision information
Provide an explanation of the changes you are making. This will help other authors understand your motivations.